Matt Kuhar vs Carlos Maria Zarate Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Matt Kuhar's recent performance on the second serve points stands at 42.58%, slightly behind Carlos Maria Zarate, who has 44.21%. Could this small edge translate into a match-winning advantage for Carlos?
• In terms of returning second serves, Kuhar has a minor advantage with 48.10% over Zarate's 47.89%. Similarly, Kuhar marginally leads in first serve returns with 30.21% compared to Zarate's 29.78%.
• Under pressure, Zarate appears more resilient, saving 52.89% of breakpoints, while Kuhar saves 45.64%. Might this suggest Zarate is better at handling critical moments?
• Over the past year, Zarate has a stronger win record at 60.76% (W/L 48/31) compared to Kuhar's 50.00% (W/L 26/26). Does this indicate greater consistency from Zarate?
• Both players have their preferred surfaces: Kuhar on Hard with a 58% win rate, and Zarate on Clay with the same 58% win rate.
• At the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Zarate outperforms with a 61.02% win rate compared to Kuhar's 50.00%.
• When it comes to opponent quality, Zarate has faced a higher average rank of 328.94 compared to Kuhar’s 426.13, suggesting Zarate has competed against tougher adversaries.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Zarate might be favored, having won 59% of such sets, while Kuhar has won only 36%.
• A stronger breakpoint conversion is seen in Kuhar, who has converted 48.11% of opportunities, compared to Zarate’s 37.35%.

Editorial Prediction (November 26, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Matt Kuhar and Carlos Maria Zarate presents an intriguing contest based on their recent performances and historical statistics.

Carlos Maria Zarate holds a slight edge in second serve points and has demonstrated resilience under pressure, with a higher breakpoint save percentage. Coupled with his strong performance against higher-ranked players and better deciding set record, Zarate appears to have the upper hand.

While Matt Kuhar exhibits commendable breakpoint conversion and marginally better returning stats, these advantages may not outweigh Zarate’s consistency and ability to perform in clutch situations.

In conclusion, given Zarate's advantages in critical statistical areas and past performance trends, he seems the more likely winner in this head-to-head matchup.